AI Training & Evaluation

Data and evaluations you can trust your model to.

We create fine-tuning datasets, build benchmarks and agentic tasks, and run multi-model evaluations for teams training and shipping LLMs — with quality control at every step.

The problems we solve

What usually goes wrong — and what we do instead.

Benchmarks that leak

Public test sets end up in training data. We build private, held-out tasks your model has never seen.

Data you can’t trust

Inconsistent labels and shallow reasoning teach the wrong lessons. Our data is written by vetted domain experts and reviewed before it ships.

Graders that can be gamed

Weak checks reward shortcuts. Our verifiers are deterministic, validated against a reference solution, and hardened so a model can’t pass without solving the task.

“Is the new model actually better?”

Impressions aren’t evidence. We run multiple attempts per model and report pass rates and failure patterns, not anecdotes.

What we offer

AI Training & Evaluation services

LLM Fine-Tuning Datasets

Expert-written training data for supervised fine-tuning and preference learning, reviewed before delivery.

  • SFT prompt–response datasets
  • Preference / RLHF pairs
  • Multi-step reasoning and tool-use traces
  • Multilingual and domain-expert data

Benchmarks & Agentic Tasks

Realistic, held-out tasks in containerised environments — each with clear instructions, automated tests and a validated reference solution.

  • Private, contamination-resistant benchmarks
  • Agentic, multi-step coding and tool-use tasks
  • Deterministic verifiers and rubrics
  • Reference solutions validated to full marks

Model Evaluation

Multi-run evaluations across models that report pass rates and failure patterns, not impressions.

  • Multi-run evaluations across models
  • Pass-rate and difficulty calibration
  • Rubric and LLM-as-judge grading
  • Failure analysis reports

Quality Control & Hardening

Independent review of datasets and tasks, and hardening so models can’t pass by gaming the grader.

  • Multi-stage review: keep, fix or reject
  • Verifier hardening and isolation
  • Instruction and rubric audits
  • Inter-annotator agreement reporting

What makes us different

Why teams choose Physarum.

Validated before delivery

Every task ships with a reference solution that scores full marks, so you know a failure is the model’s, not the task’s.

Measured on real models

We calibrate difficulty with multi-run evaluations on current models and remove tasks that are broken rather than hard.

Quality control at every step

Multi-stage review with a clear keep, fix or reject decision on every item, and an audit trail you can inspect.

Training or evaluating a model?

Tell us what you’re measuring. We can share a sample task under NDA.

Request a sample task